Most people injured by a defective product assume the law works the way it does on television: prove the product was dangerous, and the manufacturer pays. In Virginia that assumption is wrong, and it is the single most consequential thing to know before pursuing one of these claims. This state never adopted strict liability for defective products, which means proving the product hurt you is not enough. You have to prove someone was negligent, or that a warranty was broken.
This post walks through how product liability claims actually work in Virginia, the two paths available, and the deadlines that apply to each. A Richmond product liability attorney at Tronfeld West & Durrett can review your case free of charge, and we are paid only if we win.
Virginia Has Not Adopted Strict Product Liability
In the large majority of states, a manufacturer that puts a defective product into the marketplace is liable for the resulting injuries regardless of how careful it was. Virginia is one of a small handful of jurisdictions that rejected that approach. Here, an injured person generally has to proceed on negligence, on breach of warranty, or on both.
The practical effect is that the claim turns on the manufacturer’s conduct or its promises rather than on the condition of the product alone. Under a negligence theory, the ordinary elements of a negligence claim apply: the manufacturer owed a duty of reasonable care in designing, manufacturing, or warning about the product, it breached that duty, and the breach caused your injury. That is a heavier lift than strict liability, and it is why these cases need engineering evidence and internal company documents rather than simply a broken product. The injuries at stake are frequently severe enough to sit with our catastrophic injury cases as well.
For answers to your questions, call:
800-321-6741
The Three Ways a Product Can Be Defective
Whichever theory a claim proceeds under, the defect itself usually falls into one of three categories.
- Design defects. Every unit is dangerous because the design is. A machine with no guard over a moving blade, a roof that cannot hold its own weight in a rollover, or an appliance missing a standard shutoff. An unguarded blade is also how a routine task ends in an amputation. These claims turn on whether a safer alternative design was feasible when the product was made.
- Manufacturing defects. The design is sound and the line is not: a weld that did not hold, a contaminated batch, an omitted component. These are the most provable defects, since the injured unit can be measured against the manufacturer’s own specification.
- Warning and instruction defects. A risk that is not obvious goes unwarned, or the instructions make unsafe use likely. Gas appliances, chemicals, medications, and industrial equipment produce most of these, and the injuries frequently include severe burns and crush injuries.
Breach of Warranty: The Second Path
Virginia’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code gives injured people a route that does not require proving carelessness. Under Va. Code § 8.2-314, a merchant who sells goods provides an implied warranty of merchantability, meaning the goods are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used. A product that injures someone during ordinary, intended use was arguably not fit for that purpose, and the claim proceeds from there.
This route matters a great deal in vehicle cases, where a failed restraint, tire, or airbag turns an ordinary car accident into a claim against a manufacturer. A second warranty runs alongside it: Va. Code § 8.2-315 covers goods sold for a particular purpose the seller knew about, which reaches equipment specified for a job it could not safely do.
Warranty claims carry their own complications:
- Disclaimers. A seller can limit what the warranty promises, within limits the code sets.
- Notice. The seller has to be told about the breach, and late notice can cost the claim.
- Who is covered. Whether an injured person who did not buy the product counts as a beneficiary is its own question.
Because a warranty claim asks whether the product met a standard rather than whether a company was careless, we plead it alongside a negligence count so the case does not rest on proving what a manufacturer knew.
Click to contact us today
Injury Deadlines and Contract Deadlines in Virginia
The deadline depends on which theory the claim rests on, and they are not the same.
A personal injury claim carries a two-year deadline running from the date of injury, and the wider rules on the statute of limitations for personal injury claims apply to it normally. A breach of warranty claim is a contract action, and Va. Code § 8.01-246 gives five years for a written contract and three years for an unwritten one, generally running from the date of delivery rather than the date of injury. That difference occasionally means a warranty claim has expired while an injury claim is still live, or the reverse, which is a reason to have both evaluated early rather than assuming a single deadline governs.
Preserving the product matters more than the calendar in practice. A defective appliance, tool, or vehicle component that gets discarded, repaired, or returned to a manufacturer takes the case with it, since the physical evidence is what an engineer needs to establish the defect. Call Tronfeld West & Durrett before the product leaves your possession, and we will take the preservation question off your plate.
Complete a Free Case Evaluation form now
Contributory Negligence and the Misuse Defense
Virginia’s pure contributory negligence rule applies here as it does everywhere else in this state’s injury law, and in product cases it merges with the misuse defense manufacturers raise constantly.
- What misuse looks like in the file. That you ignored a warning, removed a guard, kept using a damaged tool, or used the product for something nobody intended.
- Why it is not a discount. One percent of fault bars recovery completely, so an early suggestion that you were partially at fault is an attempt to end the claim, not to price it.
- How other states differ. Under comparative negligence, partial fault trims an award. Here it erases one.
- What answers it. Proof that the product was used the way an ordinary person would use it, and that the warning was absent or inadequate.
We start that record at the first meeting, while the product and the instructions are still in the condition they were in when you were hurt.
Contact a Virginia Product Liability Lawyer
Product cases are among the most document-intensive claims in injury law. They require the product itself, an engineer who can explain what went wrong, and often internal records showing what a manufacturer knew and when. None of that assembles itself, and Virginia’s refusal to apply strict liability means the work has to be done properly from the beginning.
Tronfeld West & Durrett has represented injured Virginians since 1972, and we are big enough to handle any case while small enough to have a personal feel. In the defect cases we take on, the product that failed is very often still sitting where it failed when we are first called, and the outcomes we publish show how often that single fact carries a claim. You can contact Tronfeld West & Durrett for a free consultation, and there is no fee unless we win your case.
FAQs About Product Liability Claims in Virginia
Is Virginia a strict liability state for defective products?
No, and this sets Virginia apart from most of the country. Virginia never adopted strict liability in tort for product defects, so an injured person cannot simply show that a product was defective and caused harm. The claim has to proceed on negligence, meaning the manufacturer or seller failed to exercise reasonable care, or on the implied warranty in Va. Code § 8.2-314, meaning the product did not meet the standard the law reads into a sale. Many cases plead both, since the two theories require different proof and a claim that struggles on one may succeed on the other.
What do I need to keep after a product injury?
The product itself, above everything else. Do not return it to the manufacturer or retailer, do not have it repaired, and do not discard it, because an engineer needs to examine the actual unit that failed. Keep the packaging, the manual, the receipt or proof of purchase, and any warning labels. Photograph the scene and the product before anything is moved, save any correspondence with the seller or manufacturer, and write down exactly how you were using it. Cases are lost far more often on missing evidence than on bad law, which is why our attorneys should hear about the failure before anything is thrown away.
Can I sue the store that sold the product, not just the manufacturer?
Sometimes. Retailers and distributors can face liability under breach of warranty, since the implied warranty of merchantability attaches to merchants who sell goods. Negligence claims against a retailer are harder, because a store that simply sold a sealed product in the condition it received it often has no reason to know of a defect, and Virginia’s contributory negligence rule gives every defendant an incentive to point at your own conduct instead. Naming the seller can still matter when the manufacturer is out of business, located overseas, or otherwise difficult to reach.
Can the warranty deadline run out before the injury deadline does?
For the personal injury component, two years from the date of injury under Va. Code § 8.01-243. A breach of warranty claim follows the contract limitation instead, five years for a written contract and three for an unwritten one, and it generally begins running at delivery rather than at injury. Because the two clocks can expire at different times, an early review by Tronfeld West & Durrett is the only way to know which routes remain open.
Call or text 800-321-6741 or complete a Free Case Evaluation form
